Yes and no. I've spoken to many folks who believe that deep learning == ai, or rather that the rest of "AI" (especially older stuff) is obviated by end-to-end o

Yes and no. I've spoken to many folks who believe that deep learning == ai, or rather that the rest of "AI" (especially older stuff) is obviated by end-to-end optimization of an appropriate network. However, I don't know anyone working in AI who thinks that deep learning today is sufficient for AGI. I _suspect_ that many quietly believe that continued advances in deep learning will produce AGI.