3 ms·
Curiously the same applies to imaging sensors. They used to be inverse (front-illuminated), for process reasons, but everse (back-illuminated) sensors have bett
by blattimwind 8y ago
Curiously the same applies to imaging sensors. They used to be inverse (front-illuminated), for process reasons, but everse (back-illuminated) sensors have better sensitivity and lower noise (but are harder to manufacture).
A notable advantage of everse eye construction is the complete absence of a blind spot, which is where all the wiring passes through the sensor surface. (Image sensors never had that problem because they are connected at the edges).
- bodi 8y agoAny indication if this backlit image sensor development was inspired by nature (the octopus here, for example) or was just an independent evolution of the technology?
- nimish 8y agoIndependent. Nobody would do Frontside illumination if it weren't a lot cheaper and easier because you very clearly lose out on light.
- analog31 8y agoIndeed, the manufacturing is more difficult because the silicon has to be thinned after fabrication of the circuitry. The lucky feature of image sensors is that the image is actually shifted to the edges of the chip by an analog shift register mechanism. But they still need an electrode structure to make the shift register work, and the light has to pass through it in front-illuminated sensors.