3 ms·
No, it should not. No one puts their eyeball to the screen under any normal circumstance. And each additional pixel has implications for bandwidth. Bandwidth
by cryptonector 8y ago
No, it should not. No one puts their eyeball to the screen under any normal circumstance. And each additional pixel has implications for bandwidth. Bandwidth is a limited commodity. I don't want my internet bandwidth reduced by your desire to watch TV from less than an inch away.
- koala_man 8y agoDo you think your internet would be faster right now if no one had ever managed to make video streaming work? I think it's quite the opposite.
- ezconnect 8y agoWe need smaller pixels because the next gen tv will be a millimeter away from your eyeballs
- cryptonector 8y agoYes, we need smaller pixels for that, but that doesn't mean we need more than 4k.
- jobigoud 8y agoEyeballs close to the screen everyday: VR.
- cryptonector 8y agoNow we're talking about the angle each pixel subtends, so the size of each pixel given different screen placement distances. This does not mean we need more than 4k, just that we need smaller pixels for screens that are meant to be held closer to the eyes.