3 ms·
Because details matter. Here's an 8k image on one side and a 576 screen on the other side. https://imgur.com/a/yqMu5VU https://imgur.com/a/yqMu5VU Don't forge
by behringer 8y ago
Because details matter. Here's an 8k image on one side and a 576 screen on the other side.
https://imgur.com/a/yqMu5VU https://imgur.com/a/yqMu5VU
Don't forget to blow it up to 8k to see the full effect.
Bear in mind, if you're on a 65" screen you have to be at 2 feet to appreciate the image. Unrealistic for most purposes I understand, but at 1080p, you should be at 10 feet which is about normal. 4k should be about 8 feet which is the best viewing distance in my opinion for a theater type room. It is how my theater room is personally laid out.
8k in my opinion is probably as large as any home theater screen will ever need to be. I would not turn up my nose at being able to pause the move and step up to the screen to see some details. I already do that now on my screen.
- willtim 8y agoI think the parent point was that there is currently insufficient bandwidth to even make 576p look good for many channels. Given even a high bandwidth slot, 4K with low compression might look better than 8K with high compression. Specifying just "8K", is no guarantee of a quality picture.