4 ms·
As much as I think Trump's idiotic anti-media rhetoric erodes our democracy, when I see the NY Times publishing articles like this, it makes me cringe. First of
by dvt 8y ago
As much as I think Trump's idiotic anti-media rhetoric erodes our democracy, when I see the NY Times publishing articles like this, it makes me cringe. First of all, it's a complete non-article -- marketing firms used correlative data to make inferences about political affiliation? No way!
Second of all, instead of being a smart and pointed analysis as to why this might be bad, it somehow draws political conclusions from a fashion conference and displays a large header featuring the green-haired Christopher Wylie making fantastical claims about "Bannon's insurgency" -- even an iota of research would clearly show that today's "alt-right" movement was a decades long project started by Newt Gingrich (among others in Republican leadership) in Georgia, escalated during Clinton's impeachment proceedings, and fully developed during the Tea Party movements that preceded Trump.
But of course, these are complicated political machinations that have many moving parts. Instead, the NYT insults its readers by pandering technically- and politically- incompetent drivel like “Fashion data was used to build AI models to help Steve Bannon build his insurgency and build the alt-right” -- give me a break.
- iscrewyou 8y agoThese news don’t make a big splash when other companies use profiling to identify people. This one did because those profiles were used to incite violence. It’s news, just not to your liking.
- dvt 8y agoIt's really not news, it's clickbait (because it's controversial). I understand NYT and their like needs to make ends meet, but they need to find a better way.
- malvosenior 8y agoWhat violence did it incite?