> The percentage of people saying blockchain doesn't have a substantial use case, is about the same percentage as there were in the late 70's or early 80's say

> The percentage of people saying blockchain doesn't have a substantial use case, is about the same percentage as there were in the late 70's or early 80's saying the internet didn't have a substantial use case. Cite some numbers. Even claiming the Internet is a reasonable comparison is a leap you haven't justified. Why is it comparable to, ooh, let's just pick a completely random example, this HUGELY SUCCESSFUL THING? Why not some other technology? e.g. * blockchain: the Apple e-World of distributed databases * blockchain: the Ford Pinto gas tank of distributed databases * blockchain: the cold fusion of distributed databases