> I can't tell if you're being intentionally obtuse or if you really don't understand that the way you say something is different from what you're saying. I un

> I can't tell if you're being intentionally obtuse or if you really don't understand that the way you say something is different from what you're saying. I understand that, but I get the impression that no way of saying it will satisfy you. This is why I asked how you think they should describe it. This is why I asked if you actually disagree with any of those points. Do you? > the way they are describing it is demonstrably and indisputably leading consumers to believe their cars are actively capable of full self-driving Is it? I mean, there's obviously going to be idiot outliers for any product. A drunk person using awful judgement does not qualify as "demonstrably and indisputably" in my view. Has anybody actually demonstrated this is actually misleading to the average person?