3 ms·
Wasn’t that Japan’s strategy in the 70s and South Korea’s in the 90s? And I’m pretty sure that was the US strategy during the Industrial Revolution. Or the Eur
by anonymous59u33 8y ago
Wasn’t that Japan’s strategy in the 70s and South Korea’s in the 90s?
And I’m pretty sure that was the US strategy during the Industrial Revolution. Or the European strategy when it came to stealing Chinese silk making methods.
I guess great powers steal alike.
- MagnumOpus 8y agoWhataboutism. As always, two Wrongs don’t make a Right, and OP is not even talking about the morality of it (everyone agrees it is immoral) but about countermeasures.
- Giorgi 8y agoWhy is it immoral? It is knowledge and information must be free. Copyright and patents etc are only holding mankind back.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- neya 8y ago> Why is it immoral? Theft is immoral. I can't just sneak into your home, steal your stuff and walk away saying you're holding mankind back, can I? That's the analogy in the OP.
- HeadsUpHigh 8y agoThe argument is weather exclusivity to information and it's applications should be something that can be owned and therefore be stolen.
- JetSpiegel 8y agoSamsung hasn't lost anything, they can still make the panels themselves. The Chinese companies merely duplicated the know how.
- sumedh 8y ago> As always, two Wrongs don’t make a Right, So US, Japan, Korea got the advantage by copying why not give the same advantage to China? If your argument is because its wrong then are the other countries who benefited by copying going to be punished?