3 ms·
I can't tell if you're being intentionally obtuse or if you really don't understand that the way you say something is different from what you're saying. It's c
by neotek 8y ago
I can't tell if you're being intentionally obtuse or if you really don't understand that the way you say something is different from what you're saying.
It's completely irrelevant whether or not it's reasonable for Tesla to distinguish between having hardware capability and actual functionality, the way they are describing it is demonstrably and indisputably leading consumers to believe their cars are actively capable of full self-driving, which is absolutely not the case.
Tesla are misleading consumers, their intention is thoroughly irrelevant.
- JimDabell 8y ago> I can't tell if you're being intentionally obtuse or if you really don't understand that the way you say something is different from what you're saying. I understand that, but I get the impression that no way of saying it will satisfy you. This is why I asked how you think they should describe it. This is why I asked if you actually disagree with any of those points. Do you? > the way they are describing it is demonstrably and indisputably leading consumers to believe their cars are actively capable of full self-driving Is it? I mean, there's obviously going to be idiot outliers for any product. A drunk person using awful judgement does not qualify as "demonstrably and indisputably" in my view. Has anybody actually demonstrated this is actually misleading to the average person?
- coldtea 8y ago>Is it? I mean, there's obviously going to be idiot outliers for any product. Well, the people at Tesla who assumed a Vulcan like understanding of their marketing language from buyers are either malicious marketeers or idiots themselves.