I think the downvotes are because the GP makes a sweeping generalization to conclude and makes it seem as if the auto-pilot was the only reason the man survived

I think the downvotes are because the GP makes a sweeping generalization to conclude and makes it seem as if the auto-pilot was the only reason the man survived. Based on the report and the description of how Tesla's auto-pilot functionality is supposed to work, it sounds like a bug or unintended activation of the auto-pilot prevented an initial tragedy, and the Highway Patrol luckily developed a smart way of safely stopping the car. As was commented elsewhere, the story would have been way different had any number of factors, human or AI, been slightly different. I really hope that a proper review on what engaged the auto-pilot here is performed so there is a clearer understanding. But as for the GP, I personally find their post to be contentless, even if their reaction is one that many people might have.