4 ms·
I’d imaging getting hit by a buggy carried a significantly lower risk of fatality. Not to mention a horse is a better computer than a Tesla. But I agree with yo
by lwansbrough 8y ago
I’d imaging getting hit by a buggy carried a significantly lower risk of fatality. Not to mention a horse is a better computer than a Tesla. But I agree with your conclusion of course.
- Sharlin 8y agoNot to mention there was significantly less buggy traffic than there’s car traffic today.
- azernik 8y agoI think maybe that should be a goal for "strong AI" - not human intelligence, just the intelligence of a semi-smart animal.
- slx26 8y agowell, that's still almost as complicated as human intelligence. the only main part that's missing is language. and to be fair, although human natural languages are really tricky, you could easily build communicative, natural-like languages that computers can handle (similar in appearance to simplified english). in any case, if you are solving learning, which is needed for a semi-smart animal intelligence, you probably wouldn't be far away from solving language. we are very semi-smart ourselves
- jakobegger 8y agoMy grandma died (long before I was born) after she fell and an ox pulled a cart over her. I wouldn't rely on a horse to stop for a small obstacle like a human.