3 ms·
Not another one of these proprietary-source-masquerading-as-free apologist articles. At least it's less tone deaf than the last one (https://news.ycombinator.co
by striking 8y ago
Not another one of these proprietary-source-masquerading-as-free apologist articles. At least it's less tone deaf than the last one (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17951235 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17951235), but it's still rather tone deaf, accusing the OSI's declaration that the license isn't open source of being "myopic" and calling them policy wonks for like, just getting in the way of business, bro.
If the OSI is as incredibly irrelevant as the author claims, why even try and work with them? If you believe they're just "policy wonks" and have no other effect, what gives?
Maybe this guy has a point somewhere but I can't help but get distracted by the fact that people who think the way I do are being talked down to.