To be clear I am not arguing about ADHD. The previous poster expressed skepticism of the DSM-5 as a diagnostic tool. You responded the DSM 5 was developed wit

To be clear I am not arguing about ADHD. The previous poster expressed skepticism of the DSM-5 as a diagnostic tool. You responded the DSM 5 was developed with hard science, and that it is sufficient for diagnosis. I'm saying criticisms of the DSM-5's diagnostic strength is valid and not a fringe position. Part of the reason it is updated periodically is to improve upon its capabilities as a diagnostic tool. The belief the DSM has weaknesses is not equivalent to climate change denial.