I don't understand what point you are trying to make. First you agree with the OP that the reviews being done by volunteers who can makes mistakes somehow makes

I don't understand what point you are trying to make. First you agree with the OP that the reviews being done by volunteers who can makes mistakes somehow makes Mozilla less culpable, then you jump in to say that these volunteers are just as accountable, technically capable and security wise as an employee would be. You only seem interested in letting Mozilla off the hook rather than acknowledging the systemic issues that gave rise to this situation. > Also treating Mozilla as a company is not really the ideal mindset. Mozilla is at best a NGO, a foundation, who owns a company for legal reasons, who is also a community, who builds a ton of stuff. Except the Mozilla Corporation is the entity that develops Firefox and is a company. That company may be wholey owned by a non-profit, but it is still a company.