This is a rather paranoid argument of what Apple may do, instead of what it's actually done. Even David admits that a) he's happy to see Flash go b) we're makin

This is a rather paranoid argument of what Apple may do, instead of what it's actually done. Even David admits that a) he's happy to see Flash go b) we're making a move towards open standards and c) Adobe deserves the walloping that they're getting. Apple's done things like this before - getting rid of floppy drives, for instance, before anyone else did. (And they're very quick to remind us of this). But whether the move to 'attack' Flash is a bad thing isn't clear. Apple seems to be more obsessed with delivering the perfect user experience - and they don't give me the impression that they're picking battles for the sake of picking battles. Whether Flash (or any other technology, for that matter) gets excluded is a direct result of this obsession. Which is the right way of going about it, of course.