> my opinion this should be left to private muslim groups who might be interested in its preservation What does it say about a country when a large number of i

> my opinion this should be left to private muslim groups who might be interested in its preservation What does it say about a country when a large number of its people don't want to maintain its most famous monument because it happens to have been built by a king of the minority religion? What about other monuments - should the maintenance of India Gate be left to private Christian groups? > hindus found out its history which was suppressed by marxists and are not likely to keep paying for it What was this history? I hope you are not referring to something like https://www.booksfact.com/archeology/taj-mahal-original-name-tejo-mahalaya-ancient-siva-temple-built-1155-ad.html https://www.booksfact.com/archeology/taj-mahal-original-name... a theory being pushed by charlatan historians, and eagerly lapped up by internet hindus who suffer from a deep insecurity that India's most famous monument happens to be a "Muslim" monument.