I think being able to get 90%+ accuracy is pretty bad ass. I think with more data over time, there can hopefully be a good amount of progress that can be made.

I think being able to get 90%+ accuracy is pretty bad ass. I think with more data over time, there can hopefully be a good amount of progress that can be made. I don't even know what would make sense to improve the model (such as lowering false positive or false negative rates), but this research sounds pretty exciting!