4 ms·
in actual fact internet hindus complain the asi spends too much money on this and not on actual archaeological research my opinion this should be left to priva
by ihtjmbbc123 8y ago
in actual fact internet hindus complain the asi spends too much money on this and not on actual archaeological research
my opinion this should be left to private muslim groups who might be interested in its preservation
hindus found out its history which was suppressed by marxists and are not likely to keep paying for it
cultural death by tourists of the kind seen in japan nowadays is not desirable either
- statguy 8y ago> my opinion this should be left to private muslim groups who might be interested in its preservation What does it say about a country when a large number of its people don't want to maintain its most famous monument because it happens to have been built by a king of the minority religion? What about other monuments - should the maintenance of India Gate be left to private Christian groups? > hindus found out its history which was suppressed by marxists and are not likely to keep paying for it What was this history? I hope you are not referring to something like https://www.booksfact.com/archeology/taj-mahal-original-name-tejo-mahalaya-ancient-siva-temple-built-1155-ad.html https://www.booksfact.com/archeology/taj-mahal-original-name... a theory being pushed by charlatan historians, and eagerly lapped up by internet hindus who suffer from a deep insecurity that India's most famous monument happens to be a "Muslim" monument.
- ihtjmbbc123 8y agoit says that hindus dont want to pay to glorify islamic invasions which led to massive loot plunder and genocide of hindus same for the european colonial loot and plunder christians didnt even apologize for goa inquisition