4 ms·
Because here's something else that's true. In the day-to-day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as atheism. There is no such thing as not
by technobabble 8y ago
Because here's something else that's true.
In the day-to-day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as
atheism.
There is no such thing as not worshipping.
Everybody worships.
The only choice we get is what to worship.
And an outstanding reason for choosing some sort of god or spiritual-type
thing to worship – be it J.C. Or Allah, be it Yahweh or the Wiccan mothergoddess
or the Four Noble Truths or some infrangible set of ethical principles –
is that pretty much anything else you worship will eat you alive.
If you worship money and things – if they are where you tap real meaning
in life – then you will never have enough.
Never feel you have enough.
It's the truth.
Worship your own body and beauty and sexual allure and you will always
feel ugly, and when time and age start showing, you will die a million deaths
before they finally plant you.
On one level we all know this stuff already – it's been codified as myths,
proverbs, clichés, bromides, epigrams, parables: the skeleton of every great
story.
Worship your intellect, being seen as smart – you will end up feeling
stupid, a fraud, always on the verge of being found out.
And so on.
David Foster Wallace, from This is Water, a commencement speech he gave in 2005.
- samhain 8y ago>If you worship money and things – if they are where you tap real meaning in life – then you will never have enough. Never feel you have enough. It's the truth. The only reason he has to assert it like that is because it isn't true. He has a lack of imagination if he's not able to imagine someone who doesn't worship anything. I imagine he'd just move the goalposts though, and say "oh well they worship their lack of worship, which is a form of eating them alive." It's disingenuous at best, but probably just ignorance, so that he can sound profound without really giving a convincing argument.
- kaizendc 8y agoYou're right, the hedonic adaptation is all imaginary. David Foster Wallace and the many psychologists who support it's existence are all wrong. Perhaps they should read your dissertation on it? /s