Ignoring the basic int type and using a zoo of preprocessor defines instead is what has worked for C all that time. But I still think that native types have th

Ignoring the basic int type and using a zoo of preprocessor defines instead is what has worked for C all that time. But I still think that native types have their place. It can often be quite reasonable to accept serious limitations on narrow machines where the performance gains won by the trade-off are desperately needed, lift those limitations on wider machines and grant an enormous safety margin on the widest architectures. When you dive deeper, the values where this makes sense still tend to be "index-like", as GP stated, but they don't have to strictly be indexes (e.g. IDs, a wider machine will be capable of working on bigger datasets and therefore be more likely to exhaust a given width of IDs, all indexes are identifiers but not all identifiers are indexes)