3 ms·
> 12 and 25 years Still a low spread. No overlap is also weird, insofar that generations are supposed to be real phenomena and not just an arbitrary division.
by Ericson2314 8y ago
> 12 and 25 years
Still a low spread. No overlap is also weird, insofar that generations are supposed to be real phenomena and not just an arbitrary division.
> No that's not where they originated from.
How much does their current incarnation owe to whatever came before?
> The Millennial/Gen Y group does correspond to a boomlet.
You need to look at that children/potential mother rate. Constant means pure echo. Secondary crest further either shows we have more mothers and they mimick their own mothers in having more kids, a true cultural inheritance, or it shows that there is enough variation in maternity age that generations are sufficiently convolved such that no 1 generation begets the next. Those two can maybe be teased apart by combining the per-whole-population and per-potential-mother rates to get the mothering/potential mother rate.
Has anyone actually done any of these statistics?
- dragonwriter 8y ago> No overlap is also weird Several generation labels have overlap (recently, the “Xennial” group overlapping Gen X and Millennials is an example), and the boundaries are recognized as fuzzy, anyway. > You need to look at that children/potential mother rate. For what end? The boomlet absolutely occurred (the attribution of it as an echo boom is occasionally made, but isn't really signficant or essential.)