4 ms·

https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-border-patrol-dna-20180508-htmlstory.html https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-border-patrol-dna-20180... https://www.foxn

https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-border-patrol-dna-20180508-htmlstory.html https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-border-patrol-dna-20180... https://www.foxnews.com/us/migrant-children-being-used-as-commodity-to-circumvent-a-loophole-border-agent-says https://www.foxnews.com/us/migrant-children-being-used-as-co... https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/illegal-immigration-enforcement-separating-kids-at-border/ https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/illegal-immigration-e... https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/adults-posing-as-children-in-attempt-to-exploit-loopholes-in-us-law-says-border-officials https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/adults-posing-as-chi... https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/2/illegal-immigrant-men-sneak-children-us-exploit-fa/ https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/2/illegal-immigr... I Guess cos cnn didn’t talk about it, it must be slander and lies tho.

crc32 8y ago
From your fox news link: "On Thursday, officials revealed that in seven of 102 cases involving children under 5 separated from their guardians, the adult was determined not to actually be the parent." So ok, you're only slandering ~95% of those 102. If you don't like the term "slander" how about "generalisation" or "prejudice". Forgive me if these words have negative connotations, or "trigger feelings" - but what term would you use, to describe declaring 100% of a group to have attributes that only apply to - by your very own research - 5% of that group?