3 ms·
I don't like feeling like a conspiracy theorist, but those signals look really clean [0]. Not necessarily the military, but... it's so intentional-looking. > “
by peterlk 8y ago
I don't like feeling like a conspiracy theorist, but those signals look really clean [0]. Not necessarily the military, but... it's so intentional-looking.
> “They're too nice; they're too perfect to be nature,” she jokes, although she quickly adds that an industrial source is impossible, since no wind farms or drilling are taking place in the deep waters off Mayotte's shores.
And
> For now, though, the lack of data makes it tough to say more about the wiggly forms. Hicks' preliminary models hinted that the waves emanated from subsurface inflation, rather than a magma chamber draining or collapsing. But with a little additional data, the model flipped and pointed to chamber deflation instead.
Does lend a grain of salt toward the military theory.
[0] https://mobile.twitter.com/matarikipax/status/1061590953876582402 https://mobile.twitter.com/matarikipax/status/10615909538765...
- jerf 8y ago"“They're too nice; they're too perfect to be nature,”" Nature does on occasion surprise us with nice clean signals; for instance, the history of pulsars, where the initial signals were so clean that people couldn't help but suspect they were artificial (and I do not mock them for that, it was a reasonable thing to put on the initial pile of theories): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar#History_of_observation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar#History_of_observation The universe is still low-entropy, and will remain so for the forseeable future. Things like this can still naturally happen.
- posterboy 8y agoThe signals are filtered, reconstructed or otherwise dealt with, of course they look clean.