4 ms·
Are you really sure you want to carry on swinging over the importance of HN accepting harsh criticism of someone's wedding site? I mean, it's a _wedding_ site.
by tomhoward 8y ago
Are you really sure you want to carry on swinging over the importance of HN accepting harsh criticism of someone's wedding site? I mean, it's a _wedding_ site. Maybe just let it go?
- austincheney 8y agoIt is a policy violation or it isn't. You can't have it both ways because of sympathy confusion. At any rate, it doesn't matter. A moderator has already interjected.
- dang 8y agoWhy not just err on the side of sympathy? It's not hard, and what little information is lost that way doesn't matter so much.
- austincheney 8y agoI live in a world where the best of intentions is often responsible for entitlement and cataclysmic policy decisions. This has shaped the mode of thought amongst myself and my peers to what we call: bottom line up front, which is a cruel form of honesty. I appreciate that not everybody can encounter such thought forming experiences, but you are correct. The nature of deferring towards sympathy is the hardest challenge people in my circumstance face in adjusting from one world to another when the adjustment is required.