3 ms·
> Smaller churches are more conservative and more political, You sure that generalization holds well enough to be useful? Personally speaking, I've attended s
by mschaef 8y ago
> Smaller churches are more conservative and more political,
You sure that generalization holds well enough to be useful?
Personally speaking, I've attended services at small churches of both political alignments. (Ranging from strongly liberal/socialist all the way to the exact opposite. I can think of at least one of each in easy walking distance.)
> People are leaving smaller churches
I think this is undoubtedly true, at least in my neck of the woods. Most of the original development around here was prior to cars being commonplace, when there was a strong motivation to having a church in easy walking distance. (Especially true given that people used to be at church far more often than now.)
These days, easier access to transport (energy) means there's much less need for geographical proximity. And this, in turn, means much less need and ability to support smaller churches. (So we've also seen a number of churches converted to condos, etc.)
- kijin 8y agoI think it would be more accurate to say that small churches are free to express more extreme political alignments, both conservative and liberal. Large churches have a lot of diversity within the congregation, making it difficult for the senior pastor to steer the whole community in a single direction. This would make them more moderate on average. They also have to worry about legalities such as maintaining a tax-exempt status, so they can't endorse a particular party or candidate too strongly.
- JshWright 8y agoI don't think "moderate" is the right word here. The vast majority of large churches are solidly right of center (even in the context of American politics, which has a strong rightward lean to begin with)