> I was pleasantly surprised to go to the public whiteboard and not immediately see it covered with phalluses. Wikipedia had inclusionist vs deletionist ("this

> I was pleasantly surprised to go to the public whiteboard and not immediately see it covered with phalluses. Wikipedia had inclusionist vs deletionist ("this is strictly an online encyclopedia - most research programming languages are not notable - delete!") warfare, because the kludgy early Wikipedia infrastructure couldn't provide multiple views, so both communities couldn't be made happy. HN is a stew of high-effort insight, and low-effort cruft, because it doesn't provide multiple views, so you can't toggle between expertise and chat. A public whiteboard could be both without phalluses, and covered in them, toggled by preference. Image recognition, and user profiling, has gotten quite good. But for an absence of multiple views. Or... at least the arms race might become richer. If user requirements are multimodal, and one's current UI, being monomodal, can't cope with that, well then...