> No one is denying that ... But it seems you either do not understand or do not support that. That's far over 90% you have to appeal to, not just those who ha

> No one is denying that ... But it seems you either do not understand or do not support that. That's far over 90% you have to appeal to, not just those who happen to have a horse in the race. That's not a strawman argument, it's a viable figure of speech. > a palpable source of harm If bio and virtual gender are different, then virtual gender should remain unphased by a notion of bio gender. Since you seem to be in disagreement about that, your position appears conflicting so that any interpretation is naturally a strawman, but provocating clarification. Same as: > the other [side is trying] to restore it [harm].