4 ms·
> It is simply a matter of time before someone unexpectedly picks up dangerous readings (or doesn’t, because there’s no threat) How long do you have to wait fo
by simlevesque 8y ago
> It is simply a matter of time before someone unexpectedly picks up dangerous readings (or doesn’t, because there’s no threat)
How long do you have to wait for absence of proof to become proof of absence ?
- rocqua 8y agoDepends on your null-hypothesis. Or, from a baysian point of view, it depends on your prior distribution.