Having glanced over the bill, I see too many phrases and words that make the bill optional. Also, it uses the word reasonable, as it pertains to security. Tha

Having glanced over the bill, I see too many phrases and words that make the bill optional. Also, it uses the word reasonable, as it pertains to security. That is entirely subjective and not defined in the law. Are there any lawyers on HN today that can correct my interpretation that this law has no teeth and no actionable items?