5 ms·
Is Nicotine itself actually dangerous or is it the predominant vector that is dangerous?
by DannoHung 16y ago
Is Nicotine itself actually dangerous or is it the predominant vector that is dangerous?
- rabidsnail 16y agoSmoke doesn't cause heart disease.
- pasbesoin 16y agoFrom memory, I believe one line of thinking is that vasoconstrictors (of which nicotine is one), in the course of chronic exposure / activity, promote rigidity aka hardening of blood vessels.
- rabidsnail 16y agoI said smoke not smoking. I think you misunderstood.
- pasbesoin 16y agoI see now what you mean, although I think the brevity and nature of the comment made it easier to do so. Upvoting your comment (I did not downvote it, before).
- burnedouthacker 16y agoNicotine and the increased cholinergic activity it causes have been shown to impede apoptosis, which is one of the methods by which the body destroys unwanted cells (programmed cell death). Since apoptosis helps to remove mutated or damaged cells that may eventually become cancerous, the inhibitory actions of nicotine may create a more favourable environment for cancer to develop, though this remains to be proven. Also women who use nicotine gum and patches during the early stages of pregnancy face an increased risk of having babies with birth defects, according to a study of around 77,000 pregnant women in Denmark. The study found that women who use nicotine-replacement therapy in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy have a 60 percent greater risk of having babies with birth defects, compared to women who are non-smokers. Nicotine is a very powerful constrictor and decreases the flow of blood to the periphery of the body. It has been measured and found that there is a 29 percent blood-flow decrease to the thumb after smoking two cigarettes.
- CitizenKane 16y agoCigarette smoke has a number of carcinogens in it. While nicotine itself is not known to be a carcinogen [0] it does inhibit programmed cell death [1]. Thus, nicotine promotes carcinogenic activity in the lungs and in other bodily tissues. Interestingly, THC seems to have the exact opposite effect promoting programmed cell death rather than inhibiting it [2]. This may lead to a low risk of lung cancer when smoking marijuana as compared to a high risk of lung cancer when smoking cigarettes [3]. [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine#Toxicology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine#Toxicology [1] http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/79/1/1.full http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/79/1/1.full [2] http://www.jci.org/articles/view/37948#ABS http://www.jci.org/articles/view/37948#ABS [3] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501729.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05...
- patrickk 16y ago"This may lead to a low risk of lung cancer when smoking marijuana as compared to a high risk of lung cancer when smoking cigarettes" Many people roll tobacco and marijuana into joints. So this probably isn't true in many cases. It would be true if marijuana were to be smoked on it's own in a joint.
- dkersten 16y agoAdditionally, people tend to hold the marijuana smoke in a lot longer than they do tobacco, so (while I don't have any evidence), I imagine that also makes it more dangerous.
- varjag 16y agoPotheads warning about the dangers of tobacco smoking always struck me as a bit disingenuous. At least tobacco doesn't turn you into asocial slug. (also, pot burning still produces tar)
- scythe 16y agoNicotine demethylates when heated into nornicotine. This reacts with saliva to form the carcinogenic N-nitrosonornicotine -- which is also found in any variety of cured tobacco. While not itself carcinogenic, it is incredibly hard to separate nicotine from cancer, unfortunately. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Janda#Nornicotine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Janda#Nornicotine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-Nitrosonornicotine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-Nitrosonornicotine