6 ms·

Seems like you really know your house. Not sure if you're musically inclined but if so the OP-1 is a great tool[1][2]. If you ever make it to nyc hit me up, I k

by neom 8y ago

Seems like you really know your house. Not sure if you're musically inclined but if so the OP-1 is a great tool[1][2]. If you ever make it to nyc hit me up, I know James well and I'm sure he'd enjoy your thoughts around E2-E4. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDqThYqldBI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDqThYqldBI [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umatbZ0n4mE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umatbZ0n4mE

alakdoellan 8y ago
I ordered the op1 back in August and haven't received it yet. But I just picked up the opz last week and it's completely blown my mind, surpassed all my expectations by a considerable margin, and proven to be my go-to subway entertainment. I intend to listen to all these tracks at work tomorrow, If you have any more in an organized list somewhere I'd love to hear it. I've recently become completely obsessed with house and I can't get enough.
- neom 8y ago
  I don't have a more organized list, I just youtube around when I'm bored. Here is a cool thing though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhFIUdICYSA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhFIUdICYSA
n4r9 8y ago
Would you call that house where you're from? I think most people in the UK would pretty quickly say the Göttsching and LCD Soundsystem tracks are techno, and the Phuture track in the article is straight up acid techno. House tends to be lighter, slightly slower and more euphoric, e.g. this I would call acid house: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFhxpMnfHB0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFhxpMnfHB0 I'm intrigued because I knew an American at uni who insisted that almost all electronic music counted as "techno".
- new_here 8y ago
  House originally started out with a faster tempo around 130 BMP which then slowed to 120 BPM over time. The acid sound has more to do with the squelched bass sound produced by the synths being discussed here. So your sample is acid house, just at a slower tempo which wasn't as common with the earlier samples.
  - bascule 8y ago
    Most early house songs were ~120BPM. This includes: Frankie Knuckles - Your Love, Jesse Saunders - On and On, Mr. Fingers - Can You Feel It, Marshal Jefferson - Move Your Body (The House Music Anthem)
- coldtea 8y ago
  >I think most people in the UK would pretty quickly say the Göttsching and LCD Soundsystem tracks are techno Göttsching is indeed techno. >and the Phuture track in the article is straight up acid techno. In those days the term used for that style was "acid house". It then turned into various sub-genres (rave, trance, etc). Acid techno is a later name for later genre.
  - spunker540 8y ago
    Does anyone else find the amount of sub-genres in electronic music excessive?
    - coldtea 8y ago
      Only those lame llama-steampunk-subjitter-dub-foxtrot fans...
    - n4r9 8y ago
      To some degree, but no more than, say, the number of lisp-based programming languages or flavours of linux =]. In my mind it's something to explore rather than balk at. If you find something amazing like you've never heard before, then looking at the genre can help you to discover more things like it.
    - steveklabnik 8y ago
      As someone who used to listen to a lot of metal: no.
    - lenocinor 8y ago
      I've often said the same thing. I think when there are too many, it's not useful (though in some very real sense, every artist is its own genre), but of course one genre is useless too. Some people say "why have any genres at all", but as someone who's tried to explore musical connections where I haven't been able to find established genre names -- like between old folk music from some smaller countries, or the continuum of music featuring accordions, horns (especially trumpet and clarinet), acoustic guitars/lutes, and strings that goes from Russia down to Turkey and beyond -- it can be really painful to find related music and artists without good genres. The trick is a good balance, and I personally find that electronic music and metal (as another poster mentioned) have genres that are often too small for my purposes.
- TheOtherHobbes 8y ago
  Göttsching is krautrock - a terrible but accepted name for the pre-techno synthesizer scene that formed in Berlin in the late 60s and became popular in most of Europe (not so much Germany) in the 70s. The biggest names on the scene were Klaus Schulze and Tangerine Dream, Göttsching was in a peripheral band called Ashra Tempel but also played drums for Schulze. The less famous names on the scene - Roedelius, Cluster, Conny Schnitlzer - influenced Brian Eno's ambient music when he went over to Berlin to produce Low for Bowie. As for techno vs house - the big difference is the rhythm pattern. Techno is square and on the grid, house feels like it has some swing and the beat is "skippier" with offbeats, anticipations, and sometimes triplets.
  - flavor8 8y ago
    > Techno is square and on the grid, house feels like it has some swing and the beat is "skippier" with offbeats, anticipations, and sometimes triplets E.g. Marshall Jefferson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAR8cq5Bl94 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAR8cq5Bl94 Jeff Mills: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFlzl2IhFx4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFlzl2IhFx4
  - davedx 8y ago
    > the big difference is the rhythm pattern. Techno is square and on the grid, house feels like it has some swing and the beat is "skippier" with offbeats, anticipations, and sometimes triplets. I think I could easily find a dozen examples from both genres that don't match your description... :) BPM is the best indicator. Most house is slower, most techno is faster.
    - lbotos 8y ago
      > BPM is the best indicator. Most house is slower, most techno is faster. I'd also add that techno can be traditionally "darker" and "heavier" whereas house is usually a little more "sensual" and "groovy". As always, counterpoints can be found, but these are general orientations :)
    - neom 8y ago
      With tropical house being on the rise, I find it really blurry if it's techno or house with the more pop-y stuff these days, especially the funky/disco vibes coming out of the Paris scene right now.
rtisdale 8y ago
After wanting an OP-1 for years I finally got ahold of an OP-1 used for a decent price. It’s an absolutely amazing device but I probably wouldn’t suggest it so someone as a first synth purchase. Prior to buying it I got a Novation Circuit and then a Digitakt. The Circuit is a far less expensive device (can be had for 200-300) and is very flexible. It fits into a similar realm as an OP-1 (jambox)
- neom 8y ago
  Only reason I suggested OP-1 was I googled and saw he studies physics at Princeton, for some reason I figured he'd be a good candidate for an OP, hehe. :D
hornbaker 8y ago
Great, jonesing for a thousand dollar device now. Is there an iOS app that does something akin to the OP-1?
- lbotos 8y ago
  for a little bit more "toyish" Figure is simple, intuitive and fun to push to the limits: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/figure-make-music-beats/id511269223?mt=8 https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/figure-make-music-beats/id51...
ghotli 8y ago
Heh looks like this thread blew up. Really feels like community to just post a couple of my favorite tracks before bed and come back to all of this. Both the OP-1 links and the nyc offer are really great, thanks. Looks like a lot of fun. Two of my other favs in this constellation of things are Walking on Thin Ice [1] [2] [3] by Yoko Ono which includes guitar and keyboard from John Lennon recorded as his last recorded creative act right before he was shot. Lots of people don't like Yoko but I don't care, this song is a great dancehall hit and that Lennon guitar solo at the end really gets me. The other is Where You Go I Go Too [4] [5] by Lindstrøm which is more modern but unfolds as a singular kind of piece that was apparently toiling to make, listening to all thirty minutes each time he made a change. It's my favorite of his and has it's own unique sound but he's since said because it was such a grueling process that he won't make another like it. I'm done and this can fade away. Glad y'all enjoyed these. Thanks for the notes to those who reached out to me. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzV7FiuDYKo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzV7FiuDYKo [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_on_Thin_Ice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_on_Thin_Ice [3] https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/john-lennon-the-last-session-70673/ https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/john-lennon-th... [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I4rQRJI4l4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I4rQRJI4l4 [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_You_Go_I_Go_Too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_You_Go_I_Go_Too
nprz 8y ago
I can vouch for the OP-1, it's a super fun synth, expensive, but totally worth it. No other device makes it as fun and easy to just sit down and jam out a track.

by neom 8y ago

alakdoellan 8y ago

I ordered the op1 back in August and haven't received it yet. But I just picked up the opz last week and it's completely blown my mind, surpassed all my expectations by a considerable margin, and proven to be my go-to subway entertainment. I intend to listen to all these tracks at work tomorrow, If you have any more in an organized list somewhere I'd love to hear it. I've recently become completely obsessed with house and I can't get enough.

neom 8y ago
I don't have a more organized list, I just youtube around when I'm bored. Here is a cool thing though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhFIUdICYSA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhFIUdICYSA

n4r9 8y ago

Would you call that house where you're from? I think most people in the UK would pretty quickly say the Göttsching and LCD Soundsystem tracks are techno, and the Phuture track in the article is straight up acid techno. House tends to be lighter, slightly slower and more euphoric, e.g. this I would call acid house: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFhxpMnfHB0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFhxpMnfHB0 I'm intrigued because I knew an American at uni who insisted that almost all electronic music counted as "techno".

new_here 8y ago
House originally started out with a faster tempo around 130 BMP which then slowed to 120 BPM over time. The acid sound has more to do with the squelched bass sound produced by the synths being discussed here. So your sample is acid house, just at a slower tempo which wasn't as common with the earlier samples.
- bascule 8y ago
  Most early house songs were ~120BPM. This includes: Frankie Knuckles - Your Love, Jesse Saunders - On and On, Mr. Fingers - Can You Feel It, Marshal Jefferson - Move Your Body (The House Music Anthem)
coldtea 8y ago
>I think most people in the UK would pretty quickly say the Göttsching and LCD Soundsystem tracks are techno Göttsching is indeed techno. >and the Phuture track in the article is straight up acid techno. In those days the term used for that style was "acid house". It then turned into various sub-genres (rave, trance, etc). Acid techno is a later name for later genre.
- spunker540 8y ago
  Does anyone else find the amount of sub-genres in electronic music excessive?
  - coldtea 8y ago
    Only those lame llama-steampunk-subjitter-dub-foxtrot fans...
  - n4r9 8y ago
    To some degree, but no more than, say, the number of lisp-based programming languages or flavours of linux =]. In my mind it's something to explore rather than balk at. If you find something amazing like you've never heard before, then looking at the genre can help you to discover more things like it.
  - steveklabnik 8y ago
    As someone who used to listen to a lot of metal: no.
  - lenocinor 8y ago
    I've often said the same thing. I think when there are too many, it's not useful (though in some very real sense, every artist is its own genre), but of course one genre is useless too. Some people say "why have any genres at all", but as someone who's tried to explore musical connections where I haven't been able to find established genre names -- like between old folk music from some smaller countries, or the continuum of music featuring accordions, horns (especially trumpet and clarinet), acoustic guitars/lutes, and strings that goes from Russia down to Turkey and beyond -- it can be really painful to find related music and artists without good genres. The trick is a good balance, and I personally find that electronic music and metal (as another poster mentioned) have genres that are often too small for my purposes.
TheOtherHobbes 8y ago
Göttsching is krautrock - a terrible but accepted name for the pre-techno synthesizer scene that formed in Berlin in the late 60s and became popular in most of Europe (not so much Germany) in the 70s. The biggest names on the scene were Klaus Schulze and Tangerine Dream, Göttsching was in a peripheral band called Ashra Tempel but also played drums for Schulze. The less famous names on the scene - Roedelius, Cluster, Conny Schnitlzer - influenced Brian Eno's ambient music when he went over to Berlin to produce Low for Bowie. As for techno vs house - the big difference is the rhythm pattern. Techno is square and on the grid, house feels like it has some swing and the beat is "skippier" with offbeats, anticipations, and sometimes triplets.
- flavor8 8y ago
  > Techno is square and on the grid, house feels like it has some swing and the beat is "skippier" with offbeats, anticipations, and sometimes triplets E.g. Marshall Jefferson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAR8cq5Bl94 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAR8cq5Bl94 Jeff Mills: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFlzl2IhFx4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFlzl2IhFx4
- davedx 8y ago
  > the big difference is the rhythm pattern. Techno is square and on the grid, house feels like it has some swing and the beat is "skippier" with offbeats, anticipations, and sometimes triplets. I think I could easily find a dozen examples from both genres that don't match your description... :) BPM is the best indicator. Most house is slower, most techno is faster.
  - lbotos 8y ago
    > BPM is the best indicator. Most house is slower, most techno is faster. I'd also add that techno can be traditionally "darker" and "heavier" whereas house is usually a little more "sensual" and "groovy". As always, counterpoints can be found, but these are general orientations :)
  - neom 8y ago
    With tropical house being on the rise, I find it really blurry if it's techno or house with the more pop-y stuff these days, especially the funky/disco vibes coming out of the Paris scene right now.

rtisdale 8y ago

After wanting an OP-1 for years I finally got ahold of an OP-1 used for a decent price. It’s an absolutely amazing device but I probably wouldn’t suggest it so someone as a first synth purchase. Prior to buying it I got a Novation Circuit and then a Digitakt. The Circuit is a far less expensive device (can be had for 200-300) and is very flexible. It fits into a similar realm as an OP-1 (jambox)

neom 8y ago
Only reason I suggested OP-1 was I googled and saw he studies physics at Princeton, for some reason I figured he'd be a good candidate for an OP, hehe. :D

hornbaker 8y ago

Great, jonesing for a thousand dollar device now. Is there an iOS app that does something akin to the OP-1?

lbotos 8y ago
for a little bit more "toyish" Figure is simple, intuitive and fun to push to the limits: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/figure-make-music-beats/id511269223?mt=8 https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/figure-make-music-beats/id51...

ghotli 8y ago

Heh looks like this thread blew up. Really feels like community to just post a couple of my favorite tracks before bed and come back to all of this. Both the OP-1 links and the nyc offer are really great, thanks. Looks like a lot of fun. Two of my other favs in this constellation of things are Walking on Thin Ice [1] [2] [3] by Yoko Ono which includes guitar and keyboard from John Lennon recorded as his last recorded creative act right before he was shot. Lots of people don't like Yoko but I don't care, this song is a great dancehall hit and that Lennon guitar solo at the end really gets me. The other is Where You Go I Go Too [4] [5] by Lindstrøm which is more modern but unfolds as a singular kind of piece that was apparently toiling to make, listening to all thirty minutes each time he made a change. It's my favorite of his and has it's own unique sound but he's since said because it was such a grueling process that he won't make another like it. I'm done and this can fade away. Glad y'all enjoyed these. Thanks for the notes to those who reached out to me. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzV7FiuDYKo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzV7FiuDYKo [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_on_Thin_Ice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_on_Thin_Ice [3] https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/john-lennon-the-last-session-70673/ https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/john-lennon-th... [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I4rQRJI4l4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I4rQRJI4l4 [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_You_Go_I_Go_Too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_You_Go_I_Go_Too

nprz 8y ago

I can vouch for the OP-1, it's a super fun synth, expensive, but totally worth it. No other device makes it as fun and easy to just sit down and jam out a track.