That is incorrect. It's more like because equal opportunity is so difficult, people target equal outcome as a second best. I (decidedly liberal) only value equa

That is incorrect. It's more like because equal opportunity is so difficult, people target equal outcome as a second best. I (decidedly liberal) only value equal opportunity. But since opportunity appears to be hereditary, an equal outcome can, over time, equalize opportunity. It sure would be nice to skip that first step, and I think it's probably not going to turn out effective for a number of reasons. I don't know what would be more effective.