3 ms·
Better than? Not necessarily disagreeing, but I'm not sure what the alternatives even are at the same level of abstraction. I mean, there's PNNL's global arrays
by cbkeller 8y ago
Better than? Not necessarily disagreeing, but I'm not sure what the alternatives even are at the same level of abstraction. I mean, there's PNNL's global arrays [1] but that's higher level, or Sandia Portals [2] which is lower/transport level.. Perhaps there are newer/alternative options I don't know about?
[1] http://hpc.pnl.gov/globalarrays/ http://hpc.pnl.gov/globalarrays/
[2] http://www.cs.sandia.gov/Portals/portals4-libs.html http://www.cs.sandia.gov/Portals/portals4-libs.html
- gnufx 8y agoGlobal arrays is normally used over MPI anyhow. I guess there's SHMEM, but that's integrated with at least OpenMPI (and others, I think). CHARM++ has been used at scale, but it's semi-proprietary.