3 ms·
I find this part objectionable: When the job is completed and tested it will be open sourced, GPLV2, copyright will be assigned to 'The Modular Company BV' in
by ivanstojic 16y ago
I find this part objectionable:
When the job is completed and tested it will be open sourced, GPLV2, copyright will be assigned to 'The Modular Company BV' in the Netherlands.
If this is GPLed, then it shouldn't matter much who holds the copyright. If you want the copyright, then it's not much of a sign of your belief in open source.
Ideally you'd accept MIT licensed code.
- jacquesm 16y agoSee above for an explanation of why the transfer of copyright was added, if you have an alternative to that that will pass with my bookkeeper I'm open to it. As for MIT vs GPL, I chose the GPL because it is the license that I believe best represents the spirit of what I want to achieve. If you wish you can make a similar offer using the MIT license.