> approved form of disobedience that does not actually require disobeying anything. Would you say they are constraining the window of acceptable discourse here

> approved form of disobedience that does not actually require disobeying anything. Would you say they are constraining the window of acceptable discourse here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window) by claiming "This is what disobedience looks like, don't disobey more than this or you'd be labeled a crazy fringe fanatic"? I like what they are doing in general. All those are good awards and issues to talk about. Not sure MIT is necessarily the place that these ideas would seem controversial and require a "disobedience" label associated with them. I can think of other countries and places where creating a #MeToo movement would be very controversial.