3 ms·
> We can do so much better using cryptography and electronics no, we can't > But paper is extremely inefficient? efficiency is less important than correctnes
by sigstoat 8y ago
> We can do so much better using cryptography and electronics
no, we can't
> But paper is extremely inefficient?
efficiency is less important than correctness.
- seibelj 8y ago> no, we can't Well, that settles it!
- g45y45 8y agoI would argue its about integrity from subversion, rather than correctness. You can use electronic records and cryptography to be more correct than paper, in general. Electronic voting is easier to subvert than paper ballots. Thats why voting should be on paper, hand counted. The only group wanting instant results is the media for their reporting. Everyone else is happy to wait for something so important.
- greyhair 8y agoYour username is what I use when I want to say 'thank you' to a smart ass. Awesome.