4 ms·

You do see what you're saying right? Essentially, you're saying the government is responsible for the laws regarding censorship, not the businesses that operate

You do see what you're saying right? Essentially, you're saying the government is responsible for the laws regarding censorship, not the businesses that operate there. If censorship existed in the USA, Google would have still started under it, and simply operated with that constraint. This is no different than operating in China. Google can't influence one way or another what censorship laws exist in China, currently. If they had a significant market share there, then they might be able to negotiate terms, since they would have some leverage.

GeneralMayhem 8y ago
Why would they have leverage? Oh no, Google is threatening to leave if we don't change our censorship policy, and if Google leaves - then what? Citizens get upset? I don't think that's exactly a strong motivator to the CCP. That's kind of the problem with dictatorships; you don't have to win elections. >If censorship existed in the USA, Google would have still started under it, and simply operated with that constraint. "If the US were just like China, we'd be in no position to criticize them" - sure, but it isn't. The USA and the PRC are not the same, and I don't think it's a relevant hypothetical.
tonyztan 8y ago
Laws passed by duly elected representatives (whether in the US, EU, or elsewhere) may not be perfect, but they certainly have more legitimacy than "laws" promulgated by an authoritarian regime that sends political and religious dissidents to "reeducation" camps.