6 ms·
Quite a few languages people declare "dead" are doing just fine. We tend to associate languages like FORTRAN, COBOL, and RPG, with the term legacy which implies
by Shivetya 8y ago
Quite a few languages people declare "dead" are doing just fine. We tend to associate languages like FORTRAN, COBOL, and RPG, with the term legacy which implies old an obsolete. Yet these are behind systems we use everyday but just are not aware of it. Plus these languages serve their purpose very well, FORTRAN is excellent in scientific solutions, COBOL and RPG excel in business math and similar.
Solutions to problems are not one language dependent. Exiting systems can have new modern customer facing solutions implemented all the while exploiting the existing code base. In fact there are times were its desirable to keep what is known to work and just give new means to access the code and data behind it.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- sundarurfriend 8y ago> RPG I had never heard of this one! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_RPG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_RPG says: > [D]eveloped by IBM in 1959 as the Report Program Generator - a tool to replicate punched card processing on the IBM 1401 then updated to RPG II for the IBM System/3 in the late 1960s, and since evolved into an HLL equivalent to COBOL and PL/I.