> For example Germany treats the AfD as a far-right party, but in other countries they would be centrist at best. That is an "example" of an "overly corrupt" g

> For example Germany treats the AfD as a far-right party, but in other countries they would be centrist at best. That is an "example" of an "overly corrupt" government that labels them far-right, because they would otherwise have lost an election to them? What speech of the AfD got censored in any shape or form? Yes, in other countries what is considered far-right in Germany is considered centrist. Those countries also consider what we consider centrist as leftists. So? They're a German political party, they will get judged by Germans, on the grounds of German history, thankyouverymuch. > perhaps only censor stuff that is related to illegal activities or terrorism So basically, back to square one, since you haven't really solved the problem of who defines that and how (which we do actually over centuries, it's not a problem to not have it solved once and for all perfectly, right now -- if anything the problem here is the misunderstanding that this could be possible), achieving nothing other than claiming that the AfD isn't far-right.