I have a few questions: 1. A company is offering services in exchange of personal information. 2. Clients are perfectly voluntarily and most of them knowingly

I have a few questions: 1. A company is offering services in exchange of personal information. 2. Clients are perfectly voluntarily and most of them knowingly using those services, volunteering their personal information. 3. Why in hell should a third party forbid the above mentioned two parties to conduct business under the treat of physical retaliation (being thrown to jail or shot in case you resist arrest)? Isn't it yet another "crime" without a victim? Don't we have way too many of those "crimes" already? How exactly are those regulators better than Shariah "politicians"?