3 ms·
I mostly agree with your comment, but not this part > The only meaningful benefit is to drive revenue for Apple's secret weapon -- high margin accessories. Tho
by jamesrcole 8y ago
I mostly agree with your comment, but not this part
> The only meaningful benefit is to drive revenue for Apple's secret weapon -- high margin accessories. Those $30 earbuds have a cost that is probably <$3.
As I've argued in many other places in thread, removing the headphone jack will speed the adoption and price-reduction in wireless headphones. While this is not a pro for a lot of people, it is for others, including myself.
I don't agree with the argument that the only thing is to drive revenue to Apple, as there are many different brands of wireless headphones, just as there are with wired headphones. I own non-apple bluetooth headphones.
- Spooky23 8y agoI can see your perspective here, but I think that's an effect, but not the Apple strategy. Particularly given that they "just happened" to release magical wireless earbuds at the same time! Apple doesn't need to own the whole wireless vertical, but they are adept at cross selling within the product line.