>The latter solution isn't much better It is unquestionably better than your users, whose trust you've earned over time, suddenly finding that their app is min

>The latter solution isn't much better It is unquestionably better than your users, whose trust you've earned over time, suddenly finding that their app is mining cryptocurrency. >He didn't give anybody the power to do things in his name. His name is still on the project he gave away access to, so yes, he did. >Your vitriol would be much better aimed at... I think criticism is warranted here, but I don't think I've been especially vitriolic about it. Frankly, OP made a poor choice and is now making excuses by complaining about not being rewarded for maintaining the project rather than own up to it. There was a better way to do this without him having to perpetually maintain the project. And moreover, the herd of commenters here on HN are projecting their dissatisfaction with entitled open source users onto anyone who criticizes OP.