That's a gambler fallacy argument. You need to contextualize the price. Why did it rise? Mass public adoption with a wave of speculation. People thought they'd

That's a gambler fallacy argument. You need to contextualize the price. Why did it rise? Mass public adoption with a wave of speculation. People thought they'd all get rich off it. This is not comparable to 2013. Calling it a dip doesn't make it a dip. You need concrete reasoning for why it's going to go up to previous prices again if that's what you believe will happen. Many people got burned in the last bubble, so they're going to be cautious about it.