3 ms·
The three things that surprised me most when I visited Hiroshima back in the early 2000's. 1: No sitting US President has ever visited the city; only one previ
by evo_9 8y ago
The three things that surprised me most when I visited Hiroshima back in the early 2000's.
1: No sitting US President has ever visited the city; only one previous president had been there (Sorry I can't recall if that was Ford or Carter).
2: The center or 'target' of the drop was a hospital and most of its steel structure remained intact.
3: Nature seemed fine; trees were normal, birds were flying, and of course plenty of cats just hanging about (which is a thing anywhere you go in Japan it seems).
- casual_slacker 8y agoThey were air-detonated, I believe 200 meters above ground level, so the damage was less than the maximum potential of the bombs. Nagasaki is more solemn, the ground zero area has rubble visible in a glass display area, and ruins of a brick pillar covered with scorch marks from the historic Urakami Christian Church
- petermcneeley 8y agoair detonation is for max damage. "The air burst is.. to allow the shockwave of the fission or fusion driven explosion to bounce off the ground and back into itself, creating a shockwave that is more forceful than one from a detonation at ground level." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_burst https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_burst
- olliej 8y agoI assume the original commenter meant maximum specific damage - essentially the air detonation causes a bunch of shockwave structure (pre cursor waves I think?) that result in much increased overall damage over a much larger area at the cost of a reduction in direct damage at the point of detonation (essentially vaporising basically just a few buildings/block vs functionally demolishing an entire city). There’s a documentary called (iirc) “trinity and beyond” that covers a lot of this a at least to the level of understanding of a non-physicist like me :)
- casual_slacker 8y agoI agree, max damage was the wrong term. I was envisioning the temperatures to melt steel structures that exist closer to the detonation.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- legutierr 8y agoPresident Obama visited Hiroshima his last year in office. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/text-of-president-obamas-speech-in-hiroshima-japan.html https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/text-of-presid...
- jbay808 8y agoI read that because the building was directly below the bomb, the forces applied to it from the explosion were directly downwards and so the structure was better able to withstand them. Buildings farther away were hit with lateral forces that knocked them over. When I visited Hiroshima, it stood out to me that there were no old trees anywhere. I had just come from Kyoto, so the difference felt very apparent.