4 ms·
> There have been entire countries and regions purely run by private entities. Dictatorships are monopolies. > by experience. I think you meant historically.
by ArchTypical 8y ago
> There have been entire countries and regions purely run by private entities.
Dictatorships are monopolies.
> by experience.
I think you meant historically. What ever did you mean by "theoretically"? Theory is less useful if it doesn't match practice anyway.
- kadendogthing 8y ago>Dictatorships are monopolies. And? >I think you meant historically. I don't know what you think adding that adjective is going to change, but sure. >What ever did you mean by "theoretically"? I meant in theory.
- ArchTypical 8y ago> power of monopolies...in general is directly tied to the > There have been entire countries and regions purely run by private entities. I'm interested in an example of an entire country run by a private entity that was not a dictatorship. It doesn't help that the terms "run" and "private entity" vary from person to person, but something akin to the HEIC - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_rule_in_India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_rule_in_India is what was conjured when talking about private entity rule. > I don't know what you think adding that adjective is going to change, but sure. I'm implying no readers/posters have "experience" as stated. The adjective is a clarification, in the case that there was something missed from the strange phrasing.