> DNSoTLS and DNSoHTTPS in their short lives have already gained more traction than DNSCrypt ever got I'm not convinced at all that this is true. Cisco, Comodo

> DNSoTLS and DNSoHTTPS in their short lives have already gained more traction than DNSCrypt ever got I'm not convinced at all that this is true. Cisco, Comodo, Infoblox, Yandex, support DNSCrypt only in their products. They have no reason to switch to protocols that would require 10x more traffic. OpenNIC secure resolvers are all DNSCrypt. Cleanbrowsing resolvers probably get a lot of connections over DNSCrypt as well. I run both public resolvers accessible over DoH and DNSCrypt, and the traffic over DoH is negligible compared to the DNSCrypt one.