4 ms·
To me at least covered.com would have been a better choice for an insurance company. Though the cost to benefit of $800k makes me seriously question if that mon
by rectangletangle 8y ago
To me at least covered.com would have been a better choice for an insurance company. Though the cost to benefit of $800k makes me seriously question if that money could have been spent somewhere else with better returns.
- at-fates-hands 8y ago> Though the cost to benefit of $800k makes me seriously question if that money could have been spent somewhere else with better returns. Do insurance agents still get residual payments on policies? I know after the first dot com crash, I was interviewing at insurance companies and that was a huge selling point to become an agent. If so, the ROI might not be so bad, but 800K is a huge nut to cover and I would agree is going to take a while to make back regardless. Not such a big benefit when you have to wait 20 years to break even.