3 ms·
So if I understand you correctly, he was supposed to have run some sort of background check with all the state agencies to figure out if he was a bad actor or s
by elorm 8y ago
So if I understand you correctly, he was supposed to have run some sort of background check with all the state agencies to figure out if he was a bad actor or someone who really relied on the module and wanted to maintain it. You can’t protect against all possible outcomes from a situation like this. Seems like we’re just looking for people to blame whenever there’s an issue these days
- ddingus 8y agoFree lunch tasted bad? And let's not blame the free lunch people who are always on the hunt for people and ingredients needed to put together free lunches. Paying for a better, more consistent lunch makes sense at some point, yes? People are motivated to work, ingredients are vetted, better prepared, etc... Not blaming anyone, just pointing out an obvious problem by analogy.
- michaelmrose 8y agoHe should just not allow any party not known and trusted to distribute under the original product name. Let it be known that it's discontinued and let the new maintainer trade on his own reputation.