> And yet, two posts up you complained about control of people's freedom I'm a supporter of reasonable freedoms not unlimited freedoms. I would like checks and

> And yet, two posts up you complained about control of people's freedom I'm a supporter of reasonable freedoms not unlimited freedoms. I would like checks and balances on power and it's accumulation whether it's a person or group of persons. Just like voting rights, we at least try to achieve equal voting share for each person. Money is power it needs reasonable checks and balances so that wishes of few do not affect many. No one needs $100 million to survive or live a reasonably good life. If you need more for an endeavor you're free to appeal to others to invest into your effort. Point is, large changes needs to be made by proportionate amount of wills. > Do you no see the irony in that contradiction? There's no contradiction. It's just a suggestion to avoid a few of such problems, but if you have a better suggestions, I welcome it. >Hah! What a huge "if" Yes that's a big 'if', just like for any other idea. Only fools are certain of things, those without power have only hope.