2 ms·
of course it is not the same. but i think the argument was on the unborn baby 's rights being violated because of the genetic procedure. Also this is not a cas
by buboard 8y ago
of course it is not the same. but i think the argument was on the unborn baby 's rights being violated because of the genetic procedure.
Also this is not a case of arbitrary experimentation, the parents ARE preventing an inherited genetic issue, which is something that so far has been ethically acceptable so far, for embryo selection.
- onetimemanytime 8y ago>>the parents ARE preventing an inherited genetic issue The parents THINK they ARE preventing an inherited genetic issue. I would not dare mess with "god's creation" /evolution. Too many unknowns once you start mix and matching and there's no going back. We know very little...
- buboard 8y agothen you should not have children, but you should clone yourself. because your children are certainly going to be a messed up version of god's creation
- onetimemanytime 8y ago>>because your children are certainly going to be a messed up version of god's creation Nope, whatever happens it's the natural way: mistakes, mix, match and all.
- buboard 8y agoit seems some mistakes are more privileged than others ;)